The gangrenous rot at the heart of society
The news this week is full of the murder of 18 year-old white student Henry Nowak, cold-bloodedly stabbed to death by 23 year-old Sikh Vickrum Digwa. Digwa, with a known unhealthy interest in weapons and previous history of violence, has now been jailed for life, with a minimum term of 21 years. It was apparently Vickrum’s brother, Gurpreet, who phoned the police after Nowak’s stabbing, alleging a racist attack. When police arrived, a short time later, Digwa claimed that Nowak had racially abused him. The attending officers appear to have accepted his allegations without question, ignoring Nowak when he said he had been stabbed and that he couldn’t breathe. Digwa’s claim that he had himself been injured, as evidence of which he indicated what he claimed was a puffy eye, was again accepted, while Nowak, lying on the ground and clearly experiencing difficulties, was handcuffed and arrested for assault. Although the 18 year-old student was dying, his repeated pleas for help were entirely dismissed.
Digwa claimed that the student, on his way home after a night out and, as the saying goes, slightly the worse for wear – although, as established at trial, under the drink-drive limit – racially abused and punched him, knocking off his turban. Video footage recovered from Nowak’s phone, however, disproves this and, from start to finish, Digwa’s testimony appears to have been a tissue of lies. Rather, the truth would appear to be that he stabbed Nowak five times, pursing him down the street and filming him trying to escape, then called his parents, who arrived before the police – at which point his mother took and hid the knife.
When the police did arrive, at no point, shockingly, did they question Digwa’s version of unprovoked racist assault. And when Nowak, collapsed on the ground and gasping that he’d been stabbed, begged for help, they failed entirely to examine him properly or ask what might have happened. Instead, the police officer bending over him, said dismissively, ‘I don’t think so, mate”, before arresting him, informing him of his rights, and handcuffing him behind his back.
Nowak’s father has subsequently called the conduct of the arresting officers ‘inhumane and degrading’, and one can only imagine the anguish they must feel at how their son, in his last moments’ of life, and following what seems to have been a ‘fun’ night out, was treated. But the question must surely be asked, how would the attending officers have responded if the positions had been reversed, and if it had been Digwa lying injured on the ground? Would he have been arrested without proper enquiry and handcuffed – or would they have checked him thoroughly and called for an ambulance, while detaining Nowak for questioning?
Nigel Farage has said that the actions of the police are a clear sign of ‘anti-white prejudice’, commenting that “the rights of white people (matter) less than those of ethnic minorities”. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has robustly denied this, issuing a statement that read, “There is no such thing as two-tier policing. The police enforce the law without fear or favour, that is what the police do … we are categorical that they must treat everyone equally regardless of their ethnicity.’
Reassuring words, but are they true?
Over the last few years, we have regularly seen cases where the police have turned a blind eye to crimes perpetrated by ethnic groups. In Rotherham, for example, where an estimated 1,400 white girls were sexually groomed and abused between 1997 – 2014 by local grooming gangs of predominantly Pakistani heritage, it is well established that the police failed to investigate properly for fear of being accused of racism. Likewise, in recent terror attacks, there appears all too often to have been a deliberate suppression of the ethnicity and religion of those involved. Indeed, more commonly the public has been assured that the attack happened because the perpetrator had mental health problems – which of course they may well have done, but that by no means excludes the influence of their expressed religion or culture, and where social media messages have been left proclaiming allegiance to Islam, then surely the public has a right to know and the culprits should be treated accordingly.
Or again, on pro-Palestine and Unite the Kingdom marches, both the police and media regularly demonise demonstrators on the latter as far-right thugs and extremists – despite the fact these marches are generally peaceful and described by participants as ‘joyous’ – while the all-too-obvious violence and extremist intimidation of pro-Palestine demonstrators, calling for the death of Jews and destruction of Israel, is glossed over and ignored.
The truth is, the problems go far beyond policing, and there seems today a definite bias against the white population. For example, Secretary of State for Education Bridget Phillipson recently described White, working-class children as ‘betrayed and left-behind‘, an assertion supported by the latest Government figures for education, which show that in 2024 white students had the lowest entry figures into higher education, scoring 29.8%, as opposed to 60.1% for Chinese students, 51.4% for Asian students, and 48% for black. Sadly, it would seem that we have in fact come to a point where racism in our society definitely exists, yet it is directed not at immigrants, but rather at the white indigenous population.
From the webcam footage released of Nowak’s arrest and death, it would appear that the police are indeed at fault. But, let’s be honest, the problem goes far deeper than the police. Sir Keir Starmer himself recently said that we are in a battle for the soul of our country, and he is right. There is present in Britain today an enemy that is openly challenging our national culture, heritage, values and identity, and that is seeking to take control. What we are witnessing, in fact, is a revolution orchestrated by an enemy that until recently has remained in the shadows, but which now, as it grows stronger, is starting to come more fully into the open.
For the last hundred or so years, ideologues hostile to the founding principles of our once great nation, have wormed their way into positions of power – in government, in media, the arts … business, education, health care … Gradually but relentlessly they have seized control in every area, and are now so embedded that they feel they can openly challenge our values, culture and religion … they can even rewrite our history, portraying our forebears as wicked and rapacious exploiters, entirely motivated by greed and devoid of any redeeming feature. ‘Inclusivity’ policies and training drummed into the police are an outworking of this.
The murder of Henry Nowak hasn’t just revealed a systemic problem with the police, but
is actually reflection of a far wider problem – of a disease – that is eating away at the heart of our society. If Britain is to survive, we must return to our Christian roots, and the gangrenous spread of DEI policies, sexual reconfiguration and multi-culturalism must be recognised for the poison it is, and ruthlessly cut out.